A HERMENEUTIC ANALYSIS OF PERSONAL RECOGNITION IN BUBER AND KANT

Abstract

Personal recognition is central to human self-understanding, ethical conduct, and social cohesion. This paper examines recognition through the philosophical perspectives of Martin Buber and Immanuel Kant, arguing that an integrative approach captures both its relational and ethical dimensions. Using a hermeneutical methodology, the study analyses Buber’s I-Thou framework, which emphasises dialogue, mutual presence, and treating others as subjects rather than objects. Kant’s Categorical Imperative, by contrast, establishes recognition as a moral duty grounded in universal principles, respect for autonomy, and the intrinsic dignity of all persons. By comparing these perspectives, the paper shows that relational engagement alone risks subjectivity, while moral obligation alone may lack practical relational grounding. Integrating Buberian and Kantian insights provides a dual framework where recognition is both ethically mandated and relationally enacted. The study further demonstrates the practical relevance of this model in conflict resolution, showing how recognising the rights, autonomy, and dignity of all parties can mitigate disputes, foster cooperation, and strengthen social cohesion. Ultimately, the paper contributes to debates in moral philosophy, social theory, and conflict studies by presenting recognition as a comprehensive moral and relational practice, bridging individual experience and universal ethical obligation.